Ban count: 1
| I normally enjoy your pornographic
To the people at Sexxxotika.com, let me begin by saying
that I thoroughly enjoy your pornographic web site. I have
been a paying member since September, and since then have
reveled in the graphic images of female nudity and hardcore
sex. But I'm afraid this week your site went too
I know that Sexxxotika.com likes to push the
envelope of sexual imagery, and I fully understand that you
must cater to the peccadilloes of a wide range of
subscribers. For example, though I harbor no foot fetish
myself, I endure without complaint the occasional photo
slide show of a man licking a woman's stillettoed heel. This
is because I know your next posting likely will feature
enough streaming video of tangy young nubiles experimenting
with double-ended dildos to make my automatic credit-card
You have no idea how much I
look forward to your Thursday-afternoon site update. It is
the high point of my week. So, it is as a longtime
Sexxxotika fan that I feel obligated to share my outrage
over this week's offering.
When I logged on and saw
the headline "Bathroom!" I felt great excitement. The last
time you used a powder-room theme was February's "Showering
with Juli and Mindy," perhaps the most glorious pictorial in
Sexxxotika.com history. But upon clicking on the "Bathroom!"
link, I was not presented with more photographs of randy
lesbian girlfriends soaping each other up or masturbating
with the showerhead.
Instead, I was barraged with
images of hot young barely legal teens squatting in the
bathtub—not to reach for the bath gel, but to urinate,
sometimes even on each other. Shame on you,
I come to your web site to be erotically
entertained, not disgusted. Sure, there may be some perverts
out there who enjoy the sort of thing featured in your
"Bathroom!" gallery of last Thursday, but I'm sure I speak
for the majority of Sexxxotika regulars when I say this
montage goes way, way over the line. How could
To be honest, I've noticed a slip in
Sexxxotika's quality control over the past few months. Take,
for instance, your recent Quicktime movie "Luvving Sisters,"
which showed two luscious, nearly identical 18-year-old
blondes in the act of mutual cunnilingus. Now, I am a huge
supporter of graphic depictions of sapphic sex play, but
your suggestion that these two women were related by blood
made me more than a little uneasy. Perhaps it is my strong
devotion to family values, but the offending caption nearly
caused me to lose my erection. Granted, not every Quicktime
movie can be Citizen Came.
Yet about "Bathroom!" I
cannot remain silent. After browsing through picture after
picture of women peeing on the ground, on men, or on each
other, I can honestly say that I did not enjoy it. Not in
the slightest. You need to get back to the sort of
straightforward sex we have come to expect from
Sexxxotika.com: hot girl-on-girl action, blow jobs, anal
sex, and facials.
I believe you owe your subscribers
an apology. If you fail to use some editorial judgment in
the future, I am afraid I will be forced to cancel my
Sexxxotika membership and take my adult-entertainment dollar
elsewhere. After all, there is no shortage of web sites
featuring hot young cum-drunk gutter sluts who love 14"
horse cocks rammed into their tight little
I anxiously await your reply.